One thing that comes to mind thinking about users not having been taught how to make appropriate decisions is the prevalence of very young children with their own Facebook pages. A lot of decision-making has to occur when deciding what is appropriate to post for others to see, forever. Important decisions are made about who to “friend,” as well. I have a 6 year old cousin with a Facebook account. He knows that his parents had to lie about his age to set up the account. That message alone concerns me. I am also uncomfortable with the sexually suggestive posts that he has access to through adult friends of his parents. They aren't directing the comments to him but he can read them. That kind of humor is not necessary in a young child's life. Even with Skype, my daughter, Lin, received a message from a complete stranger requesting to be added to Lin's contact list because she “sounds like fun.” The only information available would have been Lin's first name and the state in which she lives. Creepy! Fortunately, as we had discussed, Lin brought her laptop straight to me when the message arrived. That discussion and preparation is the key, in my mind. Kids are going to use technology, we need to teach them to make good decisions for their safety. I have, as a parent chosen which social networking my children are ready for and educated them about their safe use of these sites. I push myself to open more as they become ready to handle more. Quite honestly, I don't think I have enough technology skill to ban my teen from sites. He is way more skilled than I am. I worked to set good values and good decision making in my son. Now, I need to allow him to make decisions.
Digital Use contracts employed by some districts may help. I had a cool link but it has been eaten by my overuse of the highlight and delete functions. Hopefully, the contracts would spur family discussions. It is really important to get parents and kids talking about how the kids use social media. This is not easy (talking to a teenager does not seem to be easy regardless of the topic, in my experience.) However, it is necessary. http://www.webmd.com/parenting/news/20110328/social-networking-may-affect-kids-health (http://www.digitalcitizenship.net/uploads/KidPledge1.pdf http://www.digitalcitizenship.net/uploads/ParentContract.pdf)
Classroom discussions about digital bullying are important as well as discussions about what types of digital footprints they want to establish for themselves.(http://www.northern-iowan.org/digital-bullying-a-growing-concern-among-students-1.237391)
Social networking with some controls may be a good starting place for younger kids to get the hang of things. (http://coreadvtech.com/student-safe-email -041011http://skidekids.com/ http://www.lilsugar.com/Best-Social-Networks-Kids-15191030 )
Digital communication has affected communication in the world. Change is not necessarily a bad thing. http://www.ehow.com/about_6609852_digital-technology-affect-communication_.html It has positives and negatives. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/08/110806203538.htm We need to work take advantage of the advantages. And...talk to kids about the disadvantages. http://www.onguardonline.gov/topics/social-networking-sites.aspx Banning kids os so not the answer! This principal is asking for something that would cause strife and not solve the problems.
I love the comment “Learners must be taught how to learn in a digital society. In other words, learners must be taught to learn anything, anytime, anywhere.” The ability to learn anything, anytime, anywhere is so much more valuable random sets of facts memorized for tests! Also, “As new technologies emerge, learners need to learn how to use that technology quickly and appropriately.” New technologies are intimidating to many teachers. Many educators, raised without current technologies, will need to step out of their comfort zones in order to meet students' needs.